Why is bureaucracy's relationship to democracy so conflicted Essay - 1

Why is bureaucracys relationship to democracy so conflicted - Essay workoutThere are several laws that are infringed upon by bureaucratic procedures that whitethorn be considered high-handed. Both democracy and bureaucracy present unethical properties in the semipolitical arrangement. Bureaucracys relationship to democracy is so conflicted because of the paradoxical relationship that involves satisfying both the emotional and societal interests.Structural modification has a great impact on human interaction and individuality. This is emphasized by George Ritzer, a renowned sociologist who explores the concept of McDonaldization in terms of the cultural context and rational thinking. In his book The McDonaldization of society Ritzer explores how the philosophies of fast-food restaurants define the American culture. In his opinion, McDonalds has a particular convention of entry into any region that often results in an integrated consumer pattern and the westernization of the cultu re that is invaded (Ritzer, 1993, 9). The society does not change in a bureaucratic manner as previously suggested by another renowned social theorist, scoopful Webber. Instead, his theory mostly emphasizes on the repetitive nature of actions by both consumers and McDonalds workforce. For instance, in terms of emolument, one is likely to receive the same service in any branch, and the employees are likely to use the same recipe and perform the same tasks in the preparation of food. In essence, this means that rational systems may create an awkward environment based on bureaucracy. This means that democracy is significantly undermined because of the repetitiveness in actions. There are no alternatives presented to guarantee a bureaucratic environment. According to Ritzer, traditional means of thinking are undermined by the societal concerns promoted by bureaucracy based on social control and productivity. The bureaucracy associated with most decision-making processes mean that ther e will always be interests that are not satisfied and changes in ideology